I Feel it is a real Gamble using a Card of 16 GB or more. 8 gb Cards are now cheap enough that you can have a bunch, and if one crashes or gets lost it isn't as bad as losing 64 gigs. Leanrning to keep track of the smaller cards should not be a big deal to most of us.
- Forums
- Reviews
- Articles
- Getting Started
- Top Ten Lists for Photographers
- Using Curves by Mike Russell
- Copyright Registration Made Easy
- Introduction to Shooting Raw
- Guide to Image Resizing
- CCD Cleaning by Moose Peterson
- Image Management Primer
- Landscape Photography Tips from Yosemite
- Profiling Your Printer
- Understanding Dynamic Range
- White Balance by Moose Peterson
- Photo Safaris
- Alaska Grizzly Bear & Puffin Safaris
- African Safari Botswana Wildlife Dec 2012
- Southeast Asia Photo Tour
- South Texas Bird Photo Safari
- Texas Hill Country Bird Photo Safari & Workshop
- African Safari Zambia & Zimbabwe Wildlife 2013
- Custom Photo Tours, Safaris and Personal Instruction
- Participant Guestbook & Testimonials
- Resources
- Image Galleries
- Contact Us

Jim--That's a great point. There seem to be two schools of thought on this. The "put your eggs in one basket and watch the basket" and the one you've suggested where you distribute images across several cards.
I've got sympathies for both. Your points are valid, but I've also seen folks struggle to swap cards out when in the field and it isn't very convenient. In that case they certainly would have missed a lot less shots with larger cards. And they could simply keep track of the 1 or 2 they used.
So I don't really espouse one approach or the other but figrure people will decide which way they want to go as they get some experience.--David
--David Cardinal Cardinal Photo