Nikon D810 field test–Why I’m planning to buy my review unit

Nikon D810 field test–Why I’m planning to buy my review unit

For the past few weeks I’ve been shooting with a in a variety of situations. I wasn’t enough of a fan of the D800 to purchase one, so I didn’t expect to want to purchase my review either. However, Nikon has done enough to improve the camera that it is now a winner for me, and this one will likely be staying right here in my camera bag. Here’s why…

The is just plain fun to shoot with!

The has more than lived up to expectations. Even though the upgrades from the /e are each relatively minor, taken in total they represent a substantial change, and a good one. The only downside to the changes is a tiny increase in size, and – as always seems to be the case with DSLRs these days – the price drifts higher to match the price at introduction of the . For those keeping score, the broke the previous image quality DxOMark rating record of 95 set by the D800e with a new record of 97. Since DxO does such a detailed job of providing technical analysis of the image quality, I won’t bore you with more test shots (you can ), but instead will pass along the reasons I’m planning to keep my camera, counterpointed with reasons you may choose not to:

Reasons I’m planning to purchase the

  • New AF Module from the Nikon D4S: The Autofocus is really great. As expected since it uses the same updated module, it is similar to my experience with the Nikon D4S (but in a smaller, less expensive, body). The addition of Group AF is surprisingly valuable, and overall the increase in speed is invaluable.
  • Amazing sensor: The new sensor isn’t a huge upgrade from the Nikon D800e, but it does have improved dynamic range and slightly better color – which is saying a lot given how good the Nikon D800/e sensors are.
  • Pro camera controls in a reasonable package for a non-completely-insane price. The has the pro controls I learned to love, and that Nikon used to feature even on mid-range cameras like the Nikon D300 and Nikon D700, but gave up on for the Nikon D600. This includes an ISO button on top, and a 10-pin connector.
  • Improved bracketing options over the Nikon D600 / Nikon D610. It goes beyond 3 frames like the “big boys” and the Nikon D800.
  • Broader spread of AF points, like the D800, compared to the Nikon D610.
  • Smooth, quiet shutter: No DSLR is as quiet as a good rangefinder, but the is remarkably unobtrusive. I was using the new Quiet Continuous mode to photograph a pro tennis match from the stands when I realized that the regular shutter was so quiet, that it didn’t bother the other fans either!
  • Fully-removed anti-aliasing filter: Unlike the sort-of-hack way the AA filter was negated in the Nikon D800e, the was designed without one. For most of the photography I do, it’s not a big deal, but for those looking to eek every last pixel out of their sensor it is a nice upgrade – as is the addition of an electronic front-curtain option for the shutter when used in Mirror-lock-up mode.

The performed very well as an action camera,
thanks mostly to the new AF module.
, Nikon 70-200mm f/4 AF-S VR Lens, 1/1500s @ f/6, ISO 800

Reasons you might not want to  purchase the

  • Frame Rate: 5 fps is still slower than I’d like, 6-8 would make me much happier. It’s nice that the vertical grip speeds it up a little, but I wish it was to 8 fps. Unfortunately, stepping up in speed in the Nikon line pretty much means the $6000 – awesome, but a monster to buy and use.
  • Long in the tooth: It is not a huge update from the Nikon D800, so it is not impossible that a “Nikon D900” could emerge before I felt like I got full value from the . Also, Nikon is rumored to be planning a Nikon D750, that will feature a 24MP sensor and be priced at $2500, which may be an option if you don’t need the full resolution or all the features of the .
  • CompactFlash slot: I’ve gotten used to the small-size and low-cost of SD cards, especially now that you can get them at over 100MB/s, so I’d prefer it had 2 SD slots instead of 1 SD and 1 CF. That way I could use it more easily with just my laptop or tablet and their SD slots.
  • Price: At $3300, you have to really want this camera to justify it over the $2000 Nikon D610 or even the $1100 Nikon D7100. For those for whom photography is a profession or consuming passion, the difference is worth paying, but for a lot of photographers, it is a huge amount of money for what are relatively small improvements.
  • Minor Update: If you already own a D800/e, then the is not a huge upgrade, so it might not be worth the cost of swapping.

The has an impressive natural dynamic range,
meaning HDR isn’t the only way to capture ultra-high-contrast scenes.
I shot this image to dramatize how it manages to cope well even with awful lighting.

Similarly, this tunnel at O’Hare airport isn’t easy to capture in a single frame.
The manages to get pretty good detail from the shadows,
while still retaining the highlights of the neon and the video wall.

The ’s 36MP really comes into its own for full-frame landscape shots.
It is hard, though, to make every pixel count if there is any breeze at all, because of the high resolution.
I shot this one at 1/1000s to help eliminate any movement in the scene.